Source: I will resolve this market based on whatever is stated by Matthew Stewart, who regularly posts screen time calculations on his Twitter.

For reference, here is his post for Dune (2021): https://twitter.com/MatthewAStewart/status/1457105533824077826

He calculates that Zendaya had 6 minutes & 22 seconds of screen time in Dune: Part One. Thus, this market resolves YES if the screen time he calculates for Florence Pugh in Dune: Part Two is 6:23 or higher, and it resolves NO if 6:22 or lower. (Further resolution details below).

For reference, here are the screen times he calculated for other minor/supporting roles:

• Josh Brolin - 11:31 (7.41%)

• Sharon Duncan-Brewster - 9:47 (6.29%)

• Jason Momoa - 9:29 (6.10%)

• Javier Bardem - 6:07 (3.94%)

• Stephen McKinley Henderson - 5:52 (3.77%)

• Charlotte Rampling - 5:25 (3.49%)

• Stellan Skarsgård - 5:23 (3.46%)

• Dave Bautista - 2:08 (1.37%)

Resolution edge cases (I doubt this will come up):

• If Matthew Stewart has not posted any screen time data within 3 months of the streaming release of Dune: Part Two, I will attempt to substitute with whatever reputable-looking source I can find (still comparing to the 6:22 benchmark). If I can't find a reputable-seeming replacement source, I will have to resolve this N/A (I won't attempt to calculate it myself).

• He seems to be quite consistent, so I don't think that will prove necessary.

• If he posts the screen time data for Dune: Part Two, and fairly clear that Florence Pugh is omitted because her screen time is so far below 6:22 (e.g. <30s), then I can still resolve this NO. If he posts screen time data but it only covers e.g. the top few characters (so it isn't sufficient to determine if Florence Pugh is >6:22), then I will again look for a substitute source.

• If any scenarios are unclear, please ask.

If you think it's likely that Florence Pugh has more screen time, I made a second market, requiring a >50% increase: