Resolves YES if a promotional partnership (or anything sufficiently similar) between Sydney Sweeney and Polymarket is reported by a consensus of credible media sources before March 1, 2026. Resolves NO otherwise.
I will be quite broad in the definition of "partners"—however, there needs to be evidence that Sydney Sweeney is being compensated by Polymarket (in any form) and in return she is helping promote or support the company (in any form).
1,000@BlackCrusade fwiw if there is a contested resolution I will ask @Bayesian (or another mod until I find one who is willing) to decide. I would be exceptionally surprised if this had a contested resolution!
(If one could operationalize that I’d be large amounts that this will be straightforward YES or NO. Polymarket partners with lots of people/orgs for promo/advertising. If they do that with Sweeney it will be reported on, we won’t have to guess)
i have seen someone claim that sweeney invested in polymarket years ago and i have no idea if that's true (i kinda doubt it?) but to be clear if it were true that would not resolve this YES (there clearly hasn't been some sort of promo partnership or etc in the meantime, AFAIK?). sweeney being paid in polymarket equity for any sort of promo would ofc count. but this can't resolve based on some super secret deal has been ongoing for a while but we didn't know about