Update 2025-11-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The vote must occur before the market close date (November 1, 2026).
Update 2025-11-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): "Vote to release" means to pass a motion, not just hold a vote.
The creator notes this may be ambiguous and may resolve N/A if people interpreted it in differing ways.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ173 | |
| 2 | Ṁ120 | |
| 3 | Ṁ112 | |
| 4 | Ṁ71 | |
| 5 | Ṁ54 |
People are also trading
@Xiphias Your resolution seems likely to be correct given what’s in the news, but I just want to note that the Senate hasn’t actually voted yet, so technically this resolved early (and potentially incorrectly if something weird happens tomorrow).
@eapache https://www.newsweek.com/epstein-trump-emails-house-vote-today-victims-live-updates-11063917
"The Senate followed by unanimous consent, avoiding a roll call and speeding approval."
The Senate has already passed the motion with no one objecting, without a roll-call vote.
@Xiphias Somehow I thought that was non-binding, and they still needed the formality of a vote when the session began this morning, but maybe not. Sorry for the noise.
By vote to release I meant to pass a motion, not just hold a vote. I see that it may be too ambiguous. If people interpreted it in differing ways, I can resolve it N/A.
Please let me know if you interpreted it differently.
@Xiphias Thanks for the clarification! That's how I was interpreting it: "vote to" rather than "vote on".