For the past year I've been listening to almost exclusively Blink-182, but I'm not sure if people on here like them very much.
Resolves as follows:
x>50% --> YES
x<50% --> NO
x=50% --> Coinflip
Related questions
π Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | αΉ1,491 | |
2 | αΉ172 | |
3 | αΉ127 | |
4 | αΉ119 | |
5 | αΉ99 |
@DesTiny Itβs a little weird that this market is about whether we, not you, like Blink 182 and youβre taking the main YES position in the market. Are you interested in what we actually think?
@NicoDelon well I guess I want to know what the community thinks, and I'm part of the community
@NicoDelon oh ok sorry, yeah that makes sense. Do you think I shouldn't trade on this?
@DesTiny Yes. I thought that was clear. I know thereβs disagreement about this but betting heavily in a market you control especially when you interpret the resolution criterion ambiguously and in your favor doesnβt strike me as exactly the sort of thing that gets you a trustworthy-ish badge. It would be prudent for you to abstain.
@NicoDelon Basically, let other folks decide how the market turns. If they like the band enough theyβll beat me.
@NicoDelon I don't think this is a case where the resolution criteria is ambiguous or subjective, so I don't think there's a problem with him entering the market. He also never said he wouldn't bet on the market. Although it sort of makes sense to say that him betting on the market makes the resolution criteria slightly strange since the percentage doesn't only represent "you guys" the criteria was still clearly laid out. You could also argue that anyone betting a large sum also distorts the market since it makes the result less reflective of "you guys" (presumably the group of people betting on the market), and therefore is at least as unethical as him betting.
I think you just wanted him to sell because his bets would have contributed to you losing, but if you really want to enforce that based on getting clear resolution of "you guys" I think it is appropriate that you sell most of your holdings as well.
@PatrickAupperle You can read our exchange. If you disagree fine, but youβre splitting hairs. The market was not about what Wobbles thinks. Move on.