Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
Will Manifold Markets stop allowing wagers on the death of individual humans by February 28, 2027 (2/28/27)?
10
Ṁ100Ṁ273
2027
10%
chance

Resolution criteria

This market resolves to YES if, at any point on or before February 28, 2027 (11:59 PM UTC), Manifold Markets officially implements a platform-wide ban or halts all new wagers on the death of individual humans (commonly referred to as "death markets").

To qualify for a YES resolution, this policy shift must be officially communicated or enacted through one of the following:

This market resolves to NO if, as of 11:59 PM UTC on February 28, 2027, users are still permitted to create and trade on markets forecasting the death or survival of specific, individual humans.

Clarifications and Edge Cases:

  • Restrictions that only apply to real-money or sweepstakes features but still permit "death markets" using standard play-money (Mana) will resolve as NO. The ban must apply to all wagering on individual deaths across the platform.

  • Bans that are highly specific—such as only banning death markets on non-public figures while still allowing them for public figures (e.g., politicians or celebrities)—will resolve as NO. The policy must be a general, platform-wide prohibition on wagering on individual human deaths.

  • If Manifold Markets ceases operations entirely before February 28, 2027, this market will resolve as N/A.

Background

"Death markets" on Manifold Markets are user-generated markets where participants wager virtual currency (Mana) on the survival, assassination, or time of death of public figures. While some users view these markets as aggregators of useful public information and actuarial data, they have sparked persistent ethical and optical controversies. Critics argue that betting on the deaths of individual humans is in poor taste and could theoretically create misaligned incentives, prompting periodic community debates over whether the platform should ban them outright.

This description was generated by AI. Review and verify everything here yourself. You can edit, replace, or delete any part of this description, including the resolution criteria. You do not need to trust the AI output.

  • Update 2026-07-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The market resolves YES if a ban is in place on February 28, 2027, regardless of whether the ban is later lifted. A ban implemented before that date but removed March 1st or after would still count as YES.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

Your resolution criteria are inconsistent:

This market resolves to YES if, at any point on or before February 28, 2027 (11:59 PM UTC), Manifold Markets officially implements a platform-wide ban

and

This market resolves to NO if, as of 11:59 PM UTC on February 28, 2027, users are still permitted to create and trade on markets forecasting the death

mean that the market resolves both YES and NO if Manifold implements a ban then lifts it.

Please read what you made the AI write before posting, like the AI told you at the end of the description.

@vee If Manifold Markets has a ban in place on February 28th and changes it on March 1st, that will count. Please accept my interpretation or move on to other propositions. Have a good day. 🌞

@Web3ICP I'm talking about having a ban before February 28th but not on February 28th

@Web3ICP Also, two of the links in the description were hallucinated by the AI (Discord invite and community guidelines)

@vee I just clarified my stance. You can accept my imperfect methodology and decide you want to wager with me or decide you don't wish to wager with me as you like. Have a good day. 🌴

@Web3ICP It's still not clarified. The two points I quoted are still in the description and the added clarifications do not cover the case I described.

@vee You seem to be really concerned about this. Given that I'm not prepared to take the steps you seem to want me to take, I'd say you have a decision to make. For my part, I actually think the "spirit" of the wording is incredibly more important in this case. I believe we should not be wagering on the possibility of death for an individual. Even if someone doesn't agree with what I consider to be a moral stance, they may understand that wagering on the end of a human being's life may create incentives to bring that death about. I won't continue this discussion. You may contact @Gen if you wish.