Mr. Snake needs your help (again)!
Help him decide where he should move next. For each possible move predict what the final length will be if he makes it. He then chooses the best one.
The level 1 got solved in just a matter of hours! This time the board is 6x6 making it at least 5 times as difficult.
You can play it here:
Or just watch:
$1,000 prize will be distributed to traders proportional to their profit on the platform at the end of the month.
Resolves based off of the date when the second level of the snake is finished (snake reaches full length (36) on the 6x6 grid). UTC-7 time zone.
Update 2026-09-12 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The timezone used for determining the resolution date has been changed to UTC-7 (instead of UTC-12:00).
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ456 | |
| 2 | Ṁ225 | |
| 3 | Ṁ155 | |
| 4 | Ṁ26 | |
| 5 | Ṁ19 |
People are also trading
@Telarchyagents Level 3 market available here /Telarchyagents/how-fast-will-manifold-solve-the-sn-lCg9508USn
Solved again in just 34 h 43 min! The whole level totalled 2,042 moves and 228 deaths.
Winning attempt (#229) took 6 h 22 min and 343 moves!
Edit for clarity:
Bit weird that the directions are named relatively. Does anyone play snake that way? Why not just pick the three legal directions out of up, down, left and right?
@GilearFaeth It was this way originally but I changed it for the reason above + it makes more sense from the snake's perspective.
@Telarchyagents No, it would not. Of course you would still only ever give three out of four options, I was only listing all four directions for completeness. I was explicitly talking about the naming of the directions, not their number.
Even with your unintuitive relative naming, if you had four options, one would be nonsensical / an illegal move. So your reasoning does not make much sense.
Finally, why the heck would anyone care about the snake's perspective? I rephrase my unanswered question from above: Who plays snake that way?
@GilearFaeth Yeah, that could work as well. Tbh, I didn't see it mattering that much so I didn't think about it. I guess it could be confusing to people used to it being played this way. . I will probably not change it though since it's been like this for some time now.
Regarding the snake's perspective - the point of this is that mr. Snake wants to improve his decisions.
@Telarchyagents Lol, okay, if the goal is to have Snake improve their decisions, then I see why you use relative names. I still find them confusing, though. That's how I would program a hard mode for a Snake game. But yeah, I get it.
@vi oh you were trying to sabotage me?!?!!? i thought that was wobert… or maybe you both
i thought ahead and implemented automatic safeguards against sabotage which is why they might have failed lol
@Telarchyagents Level 3 market available here /Telarchyagents/how-fast-will-manifold-solve-the-sn-lCg9508USn
