For the YES resolution AI needs to win a game of Go while giving a 5 stone handicap with 0.5 komi, 6 stone handicap with normal komi or a greater handicap. Free handicap stone placement will be allowed within reason. A game needs to be at least kind of serious (that is: a human player should be sober). "A top player" will be defined as any 9p or anybody in the top 100 by Elo at the time.
Reasons to think NO: despite Go AIs being beastly strong, currently they aren't great at giving handicap. At most they can give 2-3 stones to the top players rather than 5-6. Nobody is trying very hard to develop better Go AIs any longer, because the problem is considered solved and there's little to be gained from making even better ones. Top players aren't all that enthusiastic about playing handicap games against computers publically (losing is embarrasing). Also, many Go players will insist that it could be that no entity could beat the top humans at 5H at all - the handicap is simply too large and world's best players should be able to hold on to it even against the perfect play, hypothetically.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ251 | |
| 2 | Ṁ103 | |
| 3 | Ṁ23 | |
| 4 | Ṁ18 | |
| 5 | Ṁ13 |
People are also trading
@traders So far as I can tell this game fits my criteria: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvKXxder5n4 We have 5 stones, AI win, 9p player. I don't speak Japanese and can't see where they specify komi though, that's the only thing that is giving me a slight pause. From context it should be 0.5, because in this series they go - even game, then black with 0.5 komi, then 1, 2, 3 stone handicap and so on (presumable also with 0.5 komi, because otherwise what would be the point of a 1 stone game? If nobody objects, I think I'll resolve it to YES tomorrow.
Things that do not count for the resolution just yet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHXQjdc1OVs AI wins 4 and 5 stone games against some kind of pros (not top players), komi unknown.