🏅 Top traders

To my understanding, there was a public doc outlining much of the evidence. Regardless, it’s not clear to me that the evidence being private would be “significant enough to affect the resolution” given that the market creator had access to all of it.

Because of this, resolving NO.

To the extent there was hidden evidence if it didn’t get argued about significantly on this platform in the last week until 2 hours ago, and there are no comments on the original market in the last week, I feel confident in this resolution.

I would like to raise the issue of how secret the evidence was kept, and how the public has basically no idea what actually happened or what the evidence was.

@levifinkelstein we can ask @firstuserhere to give a summary and resolve this to NO

@levifinkelstein you asked to keep evidence secret my brother and made drama about doxxing

@levifinkelstein I think there needs to be a council needs to be formed so we can get a proper answer for all this. i propose a 13-person council to sort this mess out.

@TheWiggleMan the point is only to highlight all the controversy, thanks for helping me, however I had no intention of trying to restart all that controversy, I was merely pointing to it.

@higherLEVELING i propose to stop trolling and let dan decide what he wants with his market

@levifinkelstein can you share what evidence you shared to firstuser

@TheWiggleMan "can you share what evidence you shared to firstuser" sorry, it's way to sensitive.

@levifinkelstein ok then controversy resolved

@TheWiggleMan "ok then controversy resolved" haha, that's not how this market works 😂

@levifinkelstein hah sorry, there was no controversy, i read all comments on that market.

if you have top secret evidence, use the built-in encryption. Type it out and then highlight it and you'll see an eye icon. click the eye icon.👁. 🔐 Instant encryption! 🔐 Only those who know about this secret encryption technique will be able to decrypt it. Extremely useful and safe. Usernames, passwords, addresses, social insurance number, I've encrypted so many things with it. To demonstrate, I'm going to type a secret word or phrase. Let's see if you're able to see it.

Disagreement by Levi doesn't count. Obviously you know that

Thanks for waiting for a week @Dan. The week was over on June 22, it's been days since. Please resolve to NO. there was no controversy.

resolve please?

@higherLEVELING should resolve YES right? there was a lot of controversy regarding how secret all the proof was. Nobody really knows what went into the resolution.

@levifinkelstein resolves NO

@TheWiggleMan resolves YES

@levifinkelstein no

@TheWiggleMan yes

@levifinkelstein that's why you want controversy now

@levifinkelstein u know what. extend it indefinitely. too much controversy

This can be resolved NO @DanMan314

@Akzzz123 Definitely what I’m thinking too but going to give it until a week after closing for drama to settle.