I won't make any backroom deals to resolve this either way. This resolves only when definite evidence comes up. Until then, it'll stay open.

This market will resolve based on whether or not those two accounts were operated by the same person BEFORE this market was created - to the degree that all relevant evidence points to.

Transferring the account ownership/management to a friend after this market's creation to force a NO resolution wouldn't count.

I just want to clarify: I only agreed to listen to evidence presented privately, and try to give my opinion of the evidence. I do not consider this to be a resolution council in any formal sense. As I told both Levi and firstuserhere, the responsibility for resolving is ultimately with firstuserhere. Levi can present evidence to whoever they want to try to convince them, and I think that is what Levi is doing, and it should not be taken as anything more than that.