Eager to hear from Dan Hendrycks what he would be some of the criteria he is looking for that would cause this to resolve as Yes!
Update 2025-08-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The market did not have predefined resolution criteria, making it challenging to determine the outcome.
Based on Dan Hendrycks' tweet, it appears he believes xAI had a high relative positive impact, but whether this qualifies as a meaningful positive impact is subjective.
The creator is tentatively leaning towards resolving this market to N/A or 50-50, but is seeking opinions from others.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ47 | |
| 2 | Ṁ19 | |
| 3 | Ṁ7 | |
| 4 | Ṁ6 | |
| 5 | Ṁ6 |
https://x.com/DanHendrycks/status/1876458466145087567
This market never really had criteria so is a bit hard to resolve haha.
Based on his tweet it seems he believes XAI had a high relative positive impact, but whether this should count as a meaningful positive impact is hard to judge.
I'm tentatively leaning towards resolving this to either N/A or 50-50 but I am curious as to what others think.
