Will Dan Hendrycks believe xAI has had a meaningful positive impact on AI alignment at the end of 2024?
26
1.4kṀ2351resolved Feb 19
Resolved as
50%1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Eager to hear from Dan Hendrycks what he would be some of the criteria he is looking for that would cause this to resolve as Yes!
Update 2025-08-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The market did not have predefined resolution criteria, making it challenging to determine the outcome.
Based on Dan Hendrycks' tweet, it appears he believes xAI had a high relative positive impact, but whether this qualifies as a meaningful positive impact is subjective.
The creator is tentatively leaning towards resolving this market to N/A or 50-50, but is seeking opinions from others.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ47 | |
2 | Ṁ19 | |
3 | Ṁ7 | |
4 | Ṁ6 | |
5 | Ṁ6 |
People are also trading
Related questions
Will xAI significantly rework their alignment plan by the start of 2026?
32% chance
By the end of 2025, which piece of advice will I feel has had the most positive impact on me becoming an effective AI alignment researcher?
Will we solve AI alignment by 2026?
2% chance
Will Anthropic be the best on AI safety among major AI labs at the end of 2025?
88% chance
Will some piece of AI capabilities research done in 2023 or after be net-positive for AI alignment research?
81% chance
Will Meta AI start an AGI alignment team before 2026?
45% chance
xAI builds truth-seeking AI before 2027?
31% chance
AI honesty #2: by 2027 will we have a reasonable outer alignment procedure for training honest AI?
25% chance
Will ARC's Heuristic Arguments research substantially advance AI alignment before 2027?
26% chance
Will xAI stop working on AI research by 2029?
28% chance