
Resolves to YES if the Milky Way still exists in 2030.
I will treat this as an adversarial long-term interest market that should better reflect the interest rates in real long-term markets. I will try to keep the "No" price as high as possible. This may include:
Buying "No" shares
Buying "No" shares at inconvenient times to make people lose their league spot
Encouraging other traders to buy "No" shares
Also, I reserve the right to N/A the market at any point for any reason.
This is a factual market, so it should be ranked.
People are also trading
So.... I just came by to dump a bunch of cash because I'm not seeing anything I super want to bet on right now.
Why is this at 95%?
Does that mean I could dump my cash here and then it'll go down to 92% right when I need mana?
This feels like... the price of bonds thing. Where you can lose money on a sure bet if you have to sell early.
If all the traders together suddenly see a chance to make 20% profits elsewhere, and everyone wants to do it at the same time, everyone sells here all at once. And so this... isn't actually that stable of a cash position in a group-think environment. If I expect 20% opportunities that everyone can see to pop up occasionally, I guess I should hold my mana instead of getting the 5% gains. Huh.
@Simon74fe So.... What's a fair price here then?
Is this supposed to be a market that tracks the shared consensus across manifold of "how much will we need mana in the next month"? Like, if manifold users as a whole think they can get 20% without this market, then the price here is cheap; and if they think they can get 4% without this market, then the price here is expensive? What's a "correct" price, and how does that fit in with the added confusion of this resolving to true in 4 years (so at 95c there's actually some small growth here)?
Also, how can manifold as a whole expect to make more than the base 5%? Is this a market for "do you think you're worse than the average user at getting a return on your investment"? And only people who do think that should buy yes, and people who don't think that should not participate? I also can't see why anyone would buy no... Except in the hopes that the yes holders were actually wrong about their own goodness-at-betting (which while possibly true, definitely true initially for me, seems like the kinda bet I don't want to make in the long run).
For context, there's lots of discussion about the Jan 9th update here, which I assume is what prompted this market.
@4fa There are some scenarios where this market could resolve NO:
We find clear evidence that the Milky Way never existed and our observations were all wrong
We're in a simulation that stops rendering the Milky Way
False vacuum decay that started ~100,000+ years ago on the far side of the galaxy
Though some of these scenarios would also destroy Manifold servers...
@Simon74fe they have cloud backups of the server data, I don't think false vacuum decay could cause more than a few hours of downtime