🏅 Top traders

One week to go

Maybe.

Certainly!

@Simon74fe Love the precision!

I've been grabbing small bits of no at 97. The oddness of all this continued bickering about the mime rules makes me think the odds of either side walking have crept up.

He does not sound like someone excited to take part

I still have trouble believing this person was and may be president of the most powerful country in my lifetime. He writes like a ten year old bully.

@JaimeSantaCruz JSC FAKE NEWS

Absolutely insane for media to use the word "agree" when it's a new unilateral proposal. It's not even inadequate context, it's simply the wrong word.

tru trump never agreed to Kamala, but he agreed to a debate on ABC on the 10th, he’s backing out because it’s Kamala. Not the reason he gave about conflict of interest which would’ve been the case with the date he agreed on anyway lol “-Trump agreed, two months after filing his lawsuit, to the Sept. 10 debate on ABC” -AP News

also here’s a relevant market for this:

@n_t it isn't simply the wrong word, it's an ambiguous headline. The phrase "with Harris" has two meanings here. Either he agreed to "do a debate with Harris" (this is what happened), or he agreed with Harris to "do a debate". "Agree" here means with Fox, not Harris, btw

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/donald-trump-agrees-with-fox-news-debate-kamala-harris-sept-4-2024-08-03/

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/23/trump-says-he-is-willing-to-debate-harris-multiple-times.html