If Rootclaim/Saar Wilf loses the 100k challenge on COVID origins, will they be a sore loser?
35
670Ṁ5393
resolved Feb 29
Resolved
YES

Subjective resolution, judged by me, don't bet if that's not your cup of tea. I will not bet on this market.

For the purpose of this market, a loss is defined as at least one judge concluding that the natural origin is correct. Note that this is different than the definition in the linked market and also includes a split decision. I chose this definition because I think it includes all the scenarios which would challenge Sa'ar's extreme confidence. This market will N/A if both judges vote for lab leak or stay undecided.

I'll have to judge by the actual response, but I expect Saar to congradulate Peter or at least write a nice rather than defensive post concluding the debate, and I also expect him to update the website and the tone he uses to reflect the fact that he's lost the debate.

It's fine if he doesn't do everything I expect, I'm mostly just looking for sincere acceptance, not resorting to trying to pretend the debate didn't exist or blaming the judges of not underatanding Bayesian inference or whatever.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ446
2Ṁ125
3Ṁ123
4Ṁ110
5Ṁ41
© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy