If there are rumors but no definite confirmation, I'll resolve to a probability based on how credible the rumors are.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ307 | |
| 2 | Ṁ112 | |
| 3 | Ṁ75 | |
| 4 | Ṁ53 | |
| 5 | Ṁ38 |
id be totally ok with someone peeing in my ball pit if they pay me $400 and inherit ownership of the ball pit
manifold would have to charge an additional pigouvian tax tho.
the cost to the conference is probably significantly higher than $400
Please tag markets like this in the "Spicyfest" category instead of "Manifest" — I want the Manifest category to focus on official conference events and be G-rated. (If this becomes a problem, I may unlist or delete this market in the future...)
ugh sinclair posted that a ball pit might make an appearance and now my joke bet is killllling me slowly
Why did you make this market, that provides an incentive for someone to do it. And then bought no, so they could buy cheaper yes. Do you want it to happen?
@ShadowyZephyr It was a joke referencing an infamous event (same as the original ball pit market itself). I bought no because I don't think anyone will pee in the ball pit.
If it was determined there was pee on a ball in the ball pit, how will it be determined that it was from someone peeing as opposed to it being transfered by touch from it being dribbled onto pants and then onto ball in ball pit.
@higherLEVELING If the evidence is inconclusive, I will resolve to a probability based on how strong I think the evidence is.
@Stralor I am assuming this N/As if there's no ballpit, as per tradition in "Conditional" markets. please advise me if I'm being too reckless, otherwise I will have to go to Manifest and drag Ronald McDonald with me
