Will Jaime Maussan's 'nonhuman beings' (2023) still be considered an 'elaborate hoax' by Wikipedia in 2030?
➕
Plus
17
Ṁ8752
2030
98.1%
chance

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaime_Maussan#Alien_claims
Snapshot of current article: https://archive.is/7dZxY [2023-12-20]

Will resolve YES if there are no substantial changes to the 'Alien claims' section relating to the paragraph starting with "On 12 September 2023," of Jaime Maussan's Wikiepdia page and the 'nonhuman beings' (2023) presented by Jamie Maussan is still described as an 'elaborate hoax" on the Wikipedia page in 2030, just as it is in the snapshot linked above.

Will resolve NO if the 'Alien claims' section relating to the paragraph starting with "On 12 September 2023," of Jaime Maussan's Wikiepdia is changed/updated (or another paragraph after that calls back) to indicate that there is a scientific consensus that the 'nonhuman beings' claims are in fact not a hoax. This needs to remain for a few days at least to be sure it isn't just Wikipedia vandalism.

Will resolve N/A in 2030 if there is nothing added or changed that could resonably be considered to have a chance of triggering a NO resolution as described above, AND the string 'elaborate hoax' is no longer in the Wikipedia article at all, even if it is generally described similarly to that in the article.

If the Wikipedia page is reorganized and similar information is under a different heading, or whatever similar situation I will use my best judgement to update the description accordingly if applicable (if 'Alien claims' heading is renamed to something else, for example). Any future changes to the resolution criteria will be annotated and explained below this paragraph if needed.

Get
Ṁ1,000
and
S3.00
Sort by:
bought Ṁ2,000 YES

Similar market:

bought Ṁ30 NO

Trust.

The current detractor article published on Wired's website about the bodies states that the bodies are elaborate hoaxes, constructed of animal bones and glued together, when in reality that is not the case.

Here is a brand new scan of one of the bodies presented in Japan: December 22, 2023.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/18o1ovj/japan_ufo_briefing_event_included_a_cool_new_scan/

Also, as someone who has been following this since all of it started gaining popularity, all of the skeptics who have actually gone to investigate the bodies have come back and stated, out of preservation of their image, that indeed they can not state the bodies are fake, they are left without the ability to deny their authenticity.

Also, samples have been obtained by a major US institution and they are investigating without disclosing the study to avoid ridicule.

To those who say, why haven't they studied samples ALREADY in 2023 in other countries, they are actually incorrectly informed, a Japanese scientist obtained samples in Mexico and studied them in Japan, source:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AlienBodies/comments/17mmcg4/dr_masaru_uchi_examines_eggs_inside_of_nazca/

The evidence shown in this second video shows that if it was indeed a fake, it was performed at the individual cellular level because they show differentiation. If this was indeed an elaborate hoax it would be the most well crafted hoax of all time, period.

If you're still convinced this is gonna go YES, go ahead and bet against me, I'm gonna keep doubling down and time is on the NO side.

predictedYES

@Futurist Wikipedia says he also made several similar claims in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Do you think those were also real, or did he just do a bunch of hoaxes and then happen to find a real alien that was similar to his previous hoaxes?

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules