How is this trending

Currently, the market resolves NO, and thus the prompt is correct. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO. But the manner of Manifold complicates this. The prompt is asking if the market resolves NO, and if the market resolves NO, then technically the market is resolving NO to the prompt stating the market is resolving NO. So people who agree with the prompt stated should bet YES. But if the market resolves YES, it did not resolve NO, meaning that the prompt is false, despite users betting YES on the prompt. So in theory the market should resolve NO but bet yes

@MelvinSneedly Please read the market description carefully.

@MelvinSneedly Thank you Vizzini very cool