For the announcement, She refers to Kamala HQ. Even if the announcement is unclear who’s it’s coming from, If Kamala HQ says it in the announcement tomorrow, Resolves Yes
Resolves to all correct answers. Eg. If she endorses a candidate, announces a pac to support upcoming candidates and endorses a democratic senate candidate, resolves yes to all correct answers.
Suggest answers for me to add
https://x.com/KamalaHQ/status/2019197348178788725
Mentions ice/tim Walz etc. if it is a press release, resolves yes if they are mentioned still.
Announces something to support Democratic candidates other than herself - eg. She could announce a pac or a program to support candidates.
Twitter lefties like the announcement. I will look at Twitter. I’ll resolve based on what majority of them think. Could resolve %. Will resolve based on opinion of people like Kyle Kulinski, Hasan Piker and others in that area.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,024 | |
| 2 | Ṁ222 | |
| 3 | Ṁ194 | |
| 4 | Ṁ90 | |
| 5 | Ṁ58 |
@Eliza she’s been doing a book tour and getting good crowds. She’s still top 2 in dem 2028 polls although that’s more because of name recognition.
@Jack1 the idea of her running again is so silly. She had a chance once, and she failed. Why should anybody trust her or really any establishment candidate after what their failure led to?
@Jack1 Adam Cochran is one of the most confidently and persuasively wrong people I’ve ever seen on this app. Every time I see one of his hairbrained theories I think “wow, that’s actually quite reasonable and persuasive, but it’s also a total load of bs”. I’m remembering his multiple, repeated theories on Trump’s health, as well as his analysis of the Epstein jail footage.
