Will AGI be more attributable to bottom-up machine learning than top-down symbolic systems?
15
35
Ṁ425Ṁ310
2300
84%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
One of the questions from https://jacyanthis.com/big-questions.
Resolves according to my judgement of whether the criteria have been met, taking into account clarifications from @JacyAnthis, who made those predictions. (The goal is that they'd feel comfortable betting to their credance in this market, so I want the resolution criteria to match their intention.)
Clarifications:
Causal attribution in such cases is imprecise. I mean something like: If A and B both seem to be necessary conditions for C, and a 30% reduction in A is twice as likely to make C fail to occur as a 10% reduction in B, then C is twice as attributable to A as to B.
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
Will the first AGI be a large language model?
31% chance
Will AGI be achieved in the next 5 years?
32% chance
Will we have at least one more AI winter before AGI is realized?
65% chance
Will AGI be made up of narrow forms of AI working together when it is first reached?
35% chance
Will AGI come from a technology significantly more advanced than transformers?
38% chance
Will AGI be a problem before non-G AI?
29% chance
Will we consider the first AGI system to be neuro-symbolic?
Will geometric deep learning turn out to be as influential an idea as transformers?
24% chance
Will humans create AGI, either directly or indirectly, within the next 24 months?
25% chance
Will tweaking current Large Language Models (LLMs) lead us to achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)?
18% chance