
Will AGI be more attributable to bottom-up machine learning than top-down symbolic systems?
24
1kṀ8952300
86%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
One of the questions from https://jacyanthis.com/big-questions.
Resolves according to my judgement of whether the criteria have been met, taking into account clarifications from @JacyAnthis, who made those predictions. (The goal is that they'd feel comfortable betting to their credance in this market, so I want the resolution criteria to match their intention.)
Clarifications:
Causal attribution in such cases is imprecise. I mean something like: If A and B both seem to be necessary conditions for C, and a 30% reduction in A is twice as likely to make C fail to occur as a 10% reduction in B, then C is twice as attributable to A as to B.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will humans create AGI, either directly or indirectly, within the next 24 months?
4% chance
Will we consider the first AGI system to be neuro-symbolic?
Will we have an AGI as smart as a "generally educated human" by the end of 2025?
28% chance
Will the first AGI be built mostly within the deep learning paradigm?
80% chance
Are LLMs capable of reaching AGI?
67% chance
Will the first AGI be a large language model?
58% chance
Will AI create the first AGI?
41% chance
Will the first AGI be an LLM that emulates Nobel-prize-worthy scientific research?
26% chance
When artificial general intelligence (AGI) exists, what will be true?
Will AGI come from a technology significantly more advanced than transformers?
44% chance