
Will AGI be more attributable to bottom-up machine learning than top-down symbolic systems?
24
Ṁ1kṀ8952300
86%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
One of the questions from https://jacyanthis.com/big-questions.
Resolves according to my judgement of whether the criteria have been met, taking into account clarifications from @JacyAnthis, who made those predictions. (The goal is that they'd feel comfortable betting to their credance in this market, so I want the resolution criteria to match their intention.)
Clarifications:
Causal attribution in such cases is imprecise. I mean something like: If A and B both seem to be necessary conditions for C, and a 30% reduction in A is twice as likely to make C fail to occur as a 10% reduction in B, then C is twice as attributable to A as to B.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will we consider the first AGI system to be neuro-symbolic?
Will the first AGI be built mostly within the deep learning paradigm?
77% chance
When artificial general intelligence (AGI) exists, what will be true?
Will the first AGI be a large language model?
45% chance
Will AI create the first AGI?
41% chance
Will the first AGI be an LLM that emulates Nobel-prize-worthy scientific research?
26% chance
Will AGI come from a technology significantly more advanced than transformers?
44% chance
Will the first human level AGI be Neuromorphic/WBE rather than Prosaic?
30% chance
Will AGI be a problem before non-G AI?
20% chance
Will LLMs such as GPT-4 be seen as at most just a part of the solution to AGI? (Gary Marcus GPT-4 prediction #7)
86% chance