Will DeepMind ship in 2023?
117
892
1.2K
resolved Dec 14
Resolved
YES

Must be GPT-3.5/llama/segment-anything level and usable by api or open-source wts.

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ1,418
2Ṁ541
3Ṁ258
4Ṁ247
5Ṁ208
Sort by:
bought Ṁ1,000 of YES

As of some hours ago, Gemini Pro is now available through the "Vertex AI Gemini API":

https://ai.google.dev/

https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/generative-ai/model-reference/gemini

It is in "Preview", which means:

At Preview, products or features are ready for testing by customers. Preview offerings are often publicly announced, but are not necessarily feature-complete, and no SLAs or technical support commitments are provided for these. Unless stated otherwise by Google, Preview offerings are intended for use in test environments only. The average Preview stage lasts about six months.

Gemini Pro is claimed to be superior to GPT-3.5 and this does not appear to be in dispute:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2023/12/12/googles-new-ai-gemini-beats-chatgpt-in-30-of-32-test-categories/?sh=627aee2a6c80

At the least it is "GPT-3.5 level"

So it's usable by API, and it's GPT-3.5 level, and it is from DeepMind.

Resolves YES @Gigacasting

bought Ṁ25 of NO

https://www.wired.com/story/google-gemini-ai-model-chatgpt/
"Google says Gemini will be made available to developers through Google Cloud’s API from December 13"

bought Ṁ28 of YES

Why did you require API access? Not in the spirit of the question as asked, IMO.

predicted NO

@CarterHinsley As a NO bettor I am biased. However, I would argue that the resolution criteria are clearly listed in the description.

bought Ṁ55 of YES

What about Gemini?

predicted NO

ReTVRN

Does it need to be a language model? That's not really Deepmind's forte