I think the question is self explanatory, I am trying to test the prediction capabilities of this platform. (Crowd or Swarm Intelligence).
Will end on the Sunday of the inauguration week in January.
The question could definitely use clarification on how things like "say something racist" or "tell a lie" will be determined.
Also, you can get a more comprehensive idea of the quality of the predictions made on this platform: https://calibration.city/
@BrunoParga I am looking into what I can do after posting the question, off the top of my head I was thinking looking at the reporting (AP) after the speech. As we know there is a counter of the lies that were told while in office (since these were committed to the national archive). Something racist, we have to agree on that, but again common sense, all immigrants are criminals would be racist, objectively, right?
I am also looking into what you linked to, trying to improve this market.
@EmunaelLator "common sense, all immigrants are criminals"
Here's where we get into interpretation, though. Would you say he has said this in the past? His defenders would argue he hasn't.
@JimAusman no they're not. Immigration law is not criminal law, and administrative violations are not crimes.
@JimAusman how is that relevant to what I quoted? The quote was "all immigrants are criminals", not "all illegal immigrants are criminals".
@EmunaelLator will it resolve to the percentage equally split between everything he does? Or did you mean to do a non linked set market?
@TheAllMemeingEye I'm in agreement. I think that this market isn't set up quite right, and I think N/A is reasonable.