Will AI Safety Impact Markets (a crowdsourced charity evaluator) have ≥ 15 ranked project scouts by the end of 2023?
4
110Ṁ5682
resolved Jan 1
Resolved
YES

Our platform depends on some number of donors who either contribute insider knowledge or in-depth research to the marketplace by registering their donations. We call them project scouts. They can optionally join our public ranking at https://app.impactmarkets.io/ranking, which makes them easier to track. These project scouts seek to influence the recommendations that our platform generates for other donors like an aggregate of regrantor opinions.

To join the ranking, they have to register donations to projects that subsequently receive a positive evaluation score. So the number of ranked project scouts can increase because new project scouts join and register their old donations, or because additional projects receive an evaluation. We're gearing up for such an evaluation round right now and hope to complete it next month. Their number can also drop if project scouts opt out of the public ranking.

(Edit: The evaluation round is now complete. You can read about it on Substack. I'm planning to resolve this question to YES on Jan 1, 2024, if the number of ranked regrantors is still greater or equal at that point. I didn't want it to be interpreted as YES if the number only briefly peaks above 15 and then drops below again because that could've easily have happened in a way that is hard to reconstruct (I'd have to dig into the database) or by accident (e.g., I introduce a bug and fix it soon after). These worries are now moot, but I'd rather stick to my original plan.)

Background: We are currently in phase 1 of our rollout. Later we want to introduce our platform currency, a precursor for impact credits. (See also https://manifold.markets/DawnDrescher/will-ai-safety-impact-markets-a-cro.) Our long-term vision is to establish “generalized carbon credits” in the form of tradable impact credits to solve problems with the funding allocation to early-stage altruistic projects, access to talent, and derisking of public good funding.

H/t to Nuño for nudging me to post this.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ42
2Ṁ10
Sort by:

@chrisjbillington Inactive creator, resolved Yes. Thanks!

@DawnDrescher If this is a mistake please let us know and we can re-resolve.

Screenshot as of resolve time:

@EvanDaniel I'm not inactive, but it's not the end of 2023 yet, so I was planning to resolve it only on Jan 1, 2024. (Note that “Their number can also drop if project scouts opt out of the public ranking,” in case that's the source of the confusion.)

@DawnDrescher Thank you!

I'm still trying to figure out how best to handle stuff like this; the current moderation guidelines favor prompt resolution, and define "inactive" as not having made a comment or bet in the past week.

My reading of "by" is that it means "at any point before or including", as distinct from "at", so I thought the criteria had been met. But it's a word that's caused confusion before and I should have thought about that. My apologies.

Anyway, I've unresolved the question. Sorry about the mistaken resolution, and thank you for the prompt clarification!

@EvanDaniel Oh, got it! And thanks for pointing out the ambiguity!

It's getting pretty close now!

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules