Resolution criteria
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Harvey AI publicly announces, through official channels such as press releases, investor relations communications, or verified statements from company executives, that it has achieved an annual recurring revenue (ARR) of at least $200 million by December 31, 2026. The announcement must be made on or before January 31, 2027. If no such announcement is made by that date, the market will resolve to "No."
Background
Harvey AI, founded in 2022, is a legal technology startup that leverages generative AI to assist legal professionals with tasks such as document review, contract drafting, and legal research. The company has experienced rapid growth, reaching an ARR of $75 million by April 2025, up from $50 million at the end of 2024. In June 2025, Harvey AI secured $300 million in Series E funding, valuing the company at $5 billion. (sacra.com, techcrunch.com)
Considerations
Growth Trajectory: Harvey AI's ARR increased by 50% in the first four months of 2025. Maintaining or accelerating this growth rate would be necessary to achieve $200 million ARR by the end of 2026.
Market Expansion: The company plans to expand beyond legal services into adjacent professional sectors, such as tax accounting, which could contribute to revenue growth. (ctol.digital)
Competitive Landscape: Harvey AI faces competition from established legal tech firms and emerging AI startups (including Labs themselves via general AI products), which may impact its market share and growth potential.
People are also trading
@ChristianUlstrup @Panfilo Why is this so low? They just announced 190M at the end of the year on their website
https://www.harvey.ai/year-in-review/2025
https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2026/01/08/harvey-hits-190m-arr-building-memory-personalisation/
@prismatic nice find, ig there’s risk of them never reporting that number before eoy, but highly likely they will achieve and report it imo
@prismatic I think them reporting a historically high period of growth a week after my bet is a pretty understandable explanation for it being that low.
@Panfilo oh no i meant before this, i thought 34% was too low? (sry i didn't mean after the 190 announcement)