
Seems like a restriction that would be hard to enforce. Also, as long as the bets are non-trivial, it's basically just passing the market trading bonus to traders vs creators. But I wouldn't be surprised if folks start gaming it and there need to be some restrictions.
Obviously, if Manifold asks, I'll "n/a" these markets and cancel the offers.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ190 | |
2 | Ṁ25 | |
3 | Ṁ19 | |
4 | Ṁ17 | |
5 | Ṁ11 |
People are also trading
@IsaacKing Note that trading mana for bets is not necessarily systematically harvesting / redistributing bonuses.
There's sort of a lemons problem here - paying mana for reasonable trades actually seems fine IMO. It's valuable for both parties and makes Manifold better by getting more liquidity for markets / adding information.
But if folks are just betting 1 mana for the bonus, that seems problematic since the information / liquidity you're adding is trivial / non-existent.
@SG should we interpret this as a blanket rule against trading mana for bets? Or was it the systematic nature of that instance that was contra policy?