Resolves positively if 5 or more users claim, in good faith, that I have mis-resolved a market. If the good faith of the accusations is in question, I will defer to @IsaacKing on whether they are accusing in good faith or not.
Update 2023-04-28: As stated in comments, I will not buy yes shares.
Related questions
๐ Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | แน40 | |
| 2 | แน31 | |
| 3 | แน26 | |
| 4 | แน17 | |
| 5 | แน16 |
I think I can resolve this NO, as I did not have 5+ claims of mis-resolution.
However, I did technically misresolve this market: /CarsonGale/will-i-have-the-most-profit-on-the I marked it as "N/A", thinking that the functionality to determine topic leaderboards had been deprecated. When @IsaacKing corrected me, I modified the market resolution accordingly.
Since the spirit of the market intended a more permanent mis-resolution (for which the accidental mis-resolve wouldn't count) and the letter of the market states a requirement for 5+ claimants, I'll resolve NO.