See also:
/Bayesian/will-the-dems-control-all-3-branche
/Bayesian/will-republicans-control-all-3-bran
Update 2025-03-19 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Resolution Criteria Clarification:
For the Supreme Court, control is defined as having a majority of judges who are Democratic appointees.
@bens Yeah understandable. Maybe that’s a more interesting market to make. Markets that ask ab balance of power usually have those and not the supreme court one presumably bc that one doesnt change during the election? But just making sure, based on this terminology do u think there’s ambiguity or is it pretty clear
I think the only reasonable definition of SCOTUS control would be if a majority of judges were democratic appointees. By this definition, it seems very unlikely Democrats will control SCOTUS: Even conditioning on a D trifecta in 2028, they would need two justices to die in a 1 year window.
To elaborate on the death probabilities:
Roberts would be 74 y.o. and would have a ~3.7% chance of dying in a year
Thomas would be 80 y.o. and would have a ~6.5% chance of dying in a year
Alito would be 78 y.o. and would have a ~5.3% chance of dying in a year
Gorsuch would be 61 y.o. and would have a ~1.5% chance of dying in a year
Kavanaugh would be 64 y.o. and would have a ~1.8% chance of dying in a year
Barrett would be 57 y.o. and would have a ~0.7% chance of dying in a year
All told, this is less than 2% for two to die.
@DavidFWatson currently, the GOP - it is the current Court that implemented their long-running policy of overturning Roe v. Wade, for instance. They also gave cover to an insurrectionist running for President.
@BrunoParga Sure, but how do we decide this in 2030? Whether a Democrat or a Republican nominated each justice? Who the median is?