Related questions
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ464 | |
| 2 | Ṁ221 | |
| 3 | Ṁ209 | |
| 4 | Ṁ130 | |
| 5 | Ṁ78 |
I feel like this resolved prematurely: there is only a couple media claims of ATACMS being used. These could be rumours.
@42irrationalist Why does this happen every time someone is wrong? They accuse me of having some problem? The US has been saying the would be in Ukraine “by next week” for a month.
@42irrationalist I agree. If I had known Brian would take the view this was conclusive proof I would have bet it substantially higher than 75%
@JoshuaWilkes Do you want me to go inspect the damage caused and try to find pieces that say “ATACMS: Made in the USA”?? Come on guys. Sometimes you are wrong.
@42irrationalist what exactly is not enough about us saying we are absolutely no question providing them any day followed by a solid claim of them being used by Ukraine. There is no more evidence to be seen.
@BTE
> The US has been saying the would be in Ukraine “by next week” for a month.
So they keep promising to deliver them "by next week" for 3 weeks without actually delivering them? Why would you then resolve based on the same claim on the 4th week?
> Do you want me to go inspect the damage caused and try to find pieces that say “ATACMS: Made in the USA”?? Come on guys. Sometimes you are wrong.
I would prefer you to wait until several media reports and some OSINT organizations confirming it.
@42irrationalist I had in fact seen it. I didn’t feel the need to justify myself with a link but appreciate @SemioticRivalry doing so.
@BTE
> I didn’t feel the need to justify myself with a link
Alright, there is clearly no point of discussing this further. I'll just leave a 3 star review on the way this market was run and move on.
