
Resolves YES if the lander fails before achieving its objective. Landing scheduled for 8/21 currently.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ1,497 | |
2 | Ṁ403 | |
3 | Ṁ178 | |
4 | Ṁ167 | |
5 | Ṁ139 |
People are also trading
Now for India 👀
Resolves Yes based on Roscosmos statement
Note to self:
Read the news before increasing your NO bet:
@ICRainbow I haven't seen any further info besides the initial statement by roscosmos, just articles quoting that one statement. But tbh it's not looking hopeful 😬
@Mqrius it's dead, Jim.
https://t.me/roscosmos_gk/10540
@CorySchneider good question. It has a dozen vaguely defined objectives, and I wonder which one this market's owner has in mind.
@CorySchneider The objective is landing and transmitting back to earth. Catastrophic implies crash, no?
@BTE Catastrophic failure doesn’t necessarily imply a crash, but my main thought is that the title and the body imply two different (sets of) conditions. It could land without catastrophic failure, yet fail to “achieve its objectives”.
@CorySchneider I see. My intent was to resolve this market YES if the lander fails to communicate that it has landed safely. I never even looked at the post landing objectives, so bad choice of words in the description on my part, sorry about that.
@BTE No worries. I’m new around here and just getting a feel for how rigorous the resolution criteria tend to be. Not trying to bust your balls.
I hope they stick the landing!
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02536-2
"In June, Yuri Borisov, head of Russia’s space agency Roscosmos, described the Luna 25 mission as “high risk”, with a 70% chance of success."
@ShadowyZephyr funny that their presently stated 70% success rate contradicts their earlier statements about maximum allowed failure rate:
On 2023 June 13th, in an interview for TASS, representatives of Lavochkin Research and Production Association ("НПО имени Лавочкина") said: "In accordance with the Terms of Reference, the probability of mission success must be at least 80%.”
Source.