1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ103 | |
| 2 | Ṁ16 | |
| 3 | Ṁ3 | |
| 4 | Ṁ1 | |
| 5 | Ṁ0 |
This seems a little complicated given the results:
https://en.chessbase.com/post/kirill-shevchenko-banned-fide-edc
The Respondent is found guilty of breaching Article 11.7(e) of the Disciplinary Code.
...
The EDC Chamber found that GM Shevchenko did, in fact, hide a phone in the toilet at the Spanish Team Championship. It further concluded that he attempted to cheat but was unable to determine, with comfortable satisfaction, that actual cheating occurred.
I think that counts as "concrete evidence" -- the hidden phone -- and definitely attempted cheating. If this market were about proof of cheating it would be harder to judge, especially without any clarification from the creator, but I think the "concrete evidence" standard is weaker and met by these events.
Shevchenko admits to cheating: https://damasyreyes.es/resuelto-caso-shevchenko-trampas-campeonato-espana/amp/