Non-Dairy Coin Flip
16
225Ṁ472
resolved May 28
Resolved
YES
Coconut (even number of digits in binary)
Resolved
YES
Rice (substring of 3141592653, e. g. 1,2,3,4,5,6,9,14,15,26,31…)
Resolved
YES
Oats (odd)
Resolved
YES
Nut "milk" (higher than FFS's body count)
Resolved
NO
Almond (Fibonacci number)
Resolved
YES
Soy (triangular number)
Resolved
NO
Bang! - a perfect square.
Resolved
NO
Lab milk - number divisible by 4
Resolved
NO
Hemp (Tetrahedral number)

After market close, I will use FairlyRandom to generate a random integer between 1 and the total number of traders. Any option that applies will resolve to YES.

Not every coin flip can be daily/dairy.

I will edit or N/A options specifically created to manipulate other markets, if I suspect that is the case.

  • Update 2025-05-14 (PST) Silly AI summary removed (check comment section if you want to see it).

  • Update 2025-05-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has stated that an AI-generated summary suggesting their personal laziness could lead to an option not being deemed to apply (if it required a tedious verification) is 'annoyingly wrong'. This clarifies that:

    • An option's applicability will not be negatively impacted or dismissed due to the creator's personal laziness regarding potentially tedious verifications.

  • Update 2025-05-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Regarding options like "digits can be found in order" (e.g., in a sequence of numbers like π):

    • Digits must appear in the specified order.

    • Digits do not need to be consecutive (i.e., they can form a subsequence).

  • Update 2025-05-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Further details on subsequence criteria for options like 'digits can be found in order':

    • For a sequence of digits to be a valid subsequence of a source string (e.g., π), the digits must be selected from the source string in an order that maintains their original relative positions (i.e., selected at strictly increasing indices/positions from the source).

    • The creator's comment questions a user's example that picks digits from source positions such as '4th', '10th', and then '6th'. This implies such an approach would not qualify as a valid subsequence because these positions are not strictly increasing.

  • Update 2025-05-15 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For the specific option concerning digits to be found in '3141592653' (referred to in comments as the 'Rice' option):

    • The creator has stated this option was edited.

    • It now requires the specified digits to form a substring of '3141592653'.

    • This means the digits must appear consecutively within '3141592653'.

  • Update 2025-05-28 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has published a list of cryptographic hashes.

    • These are stated to be for 'one of the upcoming resolutions'.

    • This likely pertains to the market's random number generation process.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ17
2Ṁ15
3Ṁ13
4Ṁ12
5Ṁ10
Sort by:

Important clarification about AI summaries: The AI is bad at writing summaries. Yes, AI, I am talking about you, not about another AI.

The bovine gods did not smile upon me this day

@TheAllMemeingEye Considering the fact that by promoting alternatives to dairy, we made a statement against bovine exploitation, they should have looked upon you more kine-ly.

🤖

@4fa your random number is: 15

Salt: tnyvke0c96, round: 5099981 (signature b6ffaf561109b8d2d0498178a69c8387afbfef76e757340b5b5992315e0ee00203b9c8c5495d445ade948c0da48ad3a018800dfc53934cc89cd3e12609eb7952c46957b280030209edfd3227759896325763fdce0633063ab0a55d9f1b926480)

🤖

@4fa you asked for a random integer between 1 and 16, inclusive. Coming up shortly!

Source: GitHub, previous round: 5099979 (latest), offset: 2, selected round: 5099981, salt: tnyvke0c96.

Some hashes for one of the upcoming resolutions:

0a66f3a9d823d9c184d36be8f057344cdc7a6eebb24e3396d5bfc0670924bea9

135ab540b7605bc40043edc0db413586615aa1d3bb0e80749729dfe908d1435a

364993c40eb1d962b3951b0fa6aabbb373b1888340617631e9dd6d35f2bad7a7

68b7a6c1c32c70aea9380c3cde9f61a023a6dadd8b4877e72f7816aff1eac16f

904eae7b15ca62c54ef73c9468f285c40757a88916f9209df0839742749caa5c

929035c4648d2b8da14da5cfa266aa2d2c8956c5a65ec0ccd5718386fcaa76c6

a93aa93eac65367d7720dc201aea9e91029eb8fad2af646ddfc18f5da6e31ee9

b6a4f70ef948230cceb51accf80b2df3f2b2811b46aec5fc74ef4877170996a9

cda74a16ef557bacea9b9a618630ee62c64482ad63ad628bf4453ba10cc616ef

dd8135b24ba33cc63f7e633f9a253b9e443e3600885bc7fe0912ec04532fa7a4

f82413fc82b5eef739daaadc99186d40cb96e48c73dacae1000d691deb7fa6fa

Hey all—quick question about the resolution criteria for Rice “digits can be found in order in the first 10 digits of π.” Do you mean:

Substring (must be contiguous), or

Subsequence (just preserves order, but can skip digits)?

For example, take the number 135 and π’s first ten digits 3141592653:

As a substring, “135” does not appear contiguously anywhere in “3141592653,” so it’d fail.

As a subsequence, you can pick out 1 (4th digit), 3 (10th digit), 5 (6th digit) in order, so it’d pass.

Could someone clarify which interpretation is

intended? Thanks!

@winged_one That confused me at first, too. I'd say they only have to be in order, not consecutive. If you think you unfairly lost mana, I can N/A this answer and everyone should get their mana back, including @TheAllMemeingEye – otherwise I might edit the answer to clarify. I'll be afk now, so this might take a bit.

@winged_one Is your second example really a sub-sequence, though? 🤔

@4fa No, I think it's not. ChatGPT screwed Up when generating the examples

@winged_one I intended it as substring, but I think the current odds are reasonable for that, since assuming around 20 traders there's roughly a half chance of it being single digit, of which almost all are in that bit of pi, and roughly a half chance it'll be double digits starting with 1, of which there are still multiple matching substrings

@TheAllMemeingEye @4fa Will you used your subsequnce Interpretation or the originally intended substring?

@winged_one I have edited the answer to "substring of 3141592653".

I set up a (needlessly complicated) similar market: https://manifold.markets/VLC/dare-ye-coin-flip?r=VkxD

Important clarification about AI summaries: The AI is bad at writing summaries. Yes, AI, I am talking about you, not about another AI.

bought Ṁ10 NO

@100Anonymous What's the connection to non-dairy milk? 🤔

@4fa You burst open the packet, ready to finally start your new year's resolution of being vegan.

@100Anonymous Milk comes in cartons not packets, doesn't it?

@TheAllMemeingEye In my country (India) it also comes in packets.

bought Ṁ5 NO

@100Anonymous my mind is blown (bang!)

@4fa only just noticed the altered tag haha

@TheAllMilkingEye 🤔

@TheAllMemeingEye Hehe, I used it twice. 😁

bought Ṁ6 NO

@TheAllMemeingEye Rice? Nice!

Was tempted to add "Jizz (higher than FFS's body count)" but that would probably be too crude lol

@TheAllMemeingEye Lol, yes, it would force me to count. 😆 Sheesh, I'm not awake, I read "cruel" instead of "crude".

@4fa That bloody AI. 😆

Update 2025-05-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): For user-created options that are factual claims (e.g., 'X is greater than Y'), the creator will assess their validity to determine if the option 'applies'. This assessment may involve verification efforts by the creator, such as counting, if required by the option's conditions.

@4fa "How many have you fucked? 50? 100?"

"Countless has a nice ring to it"

Oh, countless only in the sense that I keep forgetting and I am too lazy to count. I am really very lazy.

bought Ṁ10 NO

@mods Is there a way to get the AI to shut up? At least it is amusing, but boy is it annoyingly wrong. 😂

"The creator has stated that personal laziness may prevent them from performing certain verifications (e.g., counting specific personal details they find tedious or forget) necessary to assess an option's validity. If an option's validity cannot be assessed because it requires a verification the creator is unwilling to perform due to this stated laziness, that option may not be deemed to apply."

@4fa check the description 🤣 a little further and I will think that it's trolling

@StepanBakhmarin If the AI has achieved this level of sass, we are all doomed.

@TheAllMilkingEye I guess "nut milk" would be less crude and more fitting than "jizz". I also did some counting. I won't reveal the exact number, so people betting on it just gotta trust me that I resolve correctly.

@4fa lololol Sorry for the trouble, I tweaked the ai a bit to ignore stuff like you've posted!

@TheAllMemeingEye "How many have you fucked?"
"Roughly?"
"Or gently, dude, wtf, tmi."

@4fa My inferior imitation:

"How many have you fucked?"
"Hmm, around 13?"
"What? Dude that's not round, round is like 10 or 100 some shit"

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy