Which option will LA Metro choose for the Sepulveda Transit Corridor?
3
2kṀ4652027
11%
Alternative 1 (aerial monorail along 405)
11%
Alternative 3 (aerial monorail along 405 with partial tunneling)
28%
Alternative 4 (automated heavy rail under the Santa Monica mountains, aerial in the Valley)
29%
Alternative 5 (automated heavy rail under the Santa Monica mountains, underground in the Valley)
15%
Alternative 6 (driver-operated heavy rail under the Santa Monica mountains, underground in the Valley)
6%
No build
There are currently 6 options being considered: 3 that involve tunneling a subway from UCLA to the San Fernando Valley, and 2 that involve a mostly above-ground monorail along the 405. There were originally 6 options, but "Alternative 2" has already been eliminated.
Under CEQA, LA Metro also has to study a no-build options, which would mean the project doesn't go ahead.
LA Metro page with maps (you'll need to scroll down).
If an alternative hasn't been chosen by the close date, I'll extend.
Related market:
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000People are also trading
Related questions
Will LA Metro choose a monorail option for the Sepulveda Transit Corridor?
29% chance
Will phase 1 of LA Metro’s D line line open in 2025?
65% chance
What will be the status of the Los Angeles Metro D (Purple) Line Extension by the 2028 Summer Olympics?
How will SANDAG prevent the LA/SD rail line from falling into the Pacific?
Will there be a high-speed rail between LA and SF by the end of 2040?
27% chance
Will the California HSR meet its Bay Area<->LA ridership goals by 2030 (8.5M/y)
4% chance
Will the California HSR meet its Bay Area<->LA revenue goals by 2030 ($683M/y)
6% chance
Will the SF to LA segment of the HSR be completed by 2040?
59% chance
Will the SF to LA segment of the California HSR be completed by 2050?
52% chance
Will the California HSR from LA to SF be completed by 2040?
48% chance