There are currently 6 options being considered: 3 that involve tunneling a subway from UCLA to the San Fernando Valley, and 2 that involve a mostly above-ground monorail along the 405. There were originally 6 options, but "Alternative 2" has already been eliminated.
Under CEQA, LA Metro also has to study a no-build options, which would mean the project doesn't go ahead.
LA Metro page with maps (you'll need to scroll down).
If an alternative hasn't been chosen by the close date, I'll extend.
Related market:
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,301 | |
| 2 | Ṁ223 | |
| 3 | Ṁ47 | |
| 4 | Ṁ22 |
@elderlyunfoldreason I'm leaning toward resolving to alternative 5 because the chosen alternative is described as a modified alt 5. However, there's an argument to be made that alt 6 is also valid because the modified alt 5 incorporates parts of alt 6.
Any strong opinions on whether I should resolve to just alt 5 vs. alt 5 AND alt 6?
@zQ4Z82W The characteristics you described for alt 5
> automated heavy rail under the Santa Monica mountains, underground in the Valley
most closely match what was chosen.
Whereas alt 6's do not:
> driver-operated heavy rail under the Santa Monica mountains, underground in the Valley
So if this was my market I would just do alt 5.