Based on SCOTUS' official ruling in the Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc. case.
In case of ambiguity, I will follow the consensus interpretation of authoritative newspapers (NY Times, Bloomberg News, etc.) or resolve N/A if there is not one.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ36 | |
| 2 | Ṁ26 | |
| 3 | Ṁ26 | |
| 4 | Ṁ24 | |
| 5 | Ṁ13 |
People are also trading
The majority opinion does not mention the question as far as I can tell, which is commonly understood (and by Kavanaugh) as implying they should be refunded. So I'm inclined to resolve either "Yes" or "Partially". I initially meant the latter as "they should be partially refunded", but technically it can also mean "the court partially expects them to".
What do you think?
@vee if they don't reach the question in this case, and don't hear another such case until trump leaves, then they'd never reach it
Related market regarding the constitutionality instead of the consequences: https://manifold.markets/Mad2live/how-will-the-scotus-rules-on-trumps