Rules (In Progress)
If the answer is marked HUMAN, it will be resolved NO if an object or other non-human wins (Example: ChatGPT does not count as an English speaker)
If the answer is marked INDIVIDUAL, it will resolve NO if more than one person wins.
If a group of people wins, an answer must apply to ALL of them for it to resolve YES. (Example: If the answer is 'Bald', and a group of five people win, it will resolve YES if all five are Bald, and NO if at least one person is not Bald.)
I reserve the right to NA any answer for any reason, to combat duplicates or abuse.
Update 2024-11-12 (PST): - Blonde hair will count for people who dye their hair blonde, even if their natural hair color is different (AI summary of creator comment)
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ548 | |
| 2 | Ṁ370 | |
| 3 | Ṁ204 | |
| 4 | Ṁ183 | |
| 5 | Ṁ142 |
People are also trading
@strutheo How does "Blonde" resolve if it's Trump? Trump has brown hair (right?) but has dyed it blonde for much of his adult life.
@strutheo lol this should be marked “citation needed” as let’s just say there could be significant debate as to the veracity of this claim.
@Gen trying to think of a good way to do this
Method 1 - classify all answers as 'individual' or 'group' in the response. and if a a 'group' ends up being picked, i can NA or NO all the 'individual' answers (like blue eyes , 6 feet tall, etc)
Method 2 - if there is a group of people and any one of them has the trait (eg blue eyes) then we can resolve those YES
still unsure which i prefer
@Tumbles I think most year's would be a no. 2023's winner might need a pole, I mean poll, to resolve. There's quite a large sample to draw results from.
But ya, I say Tumbles gets the final say on this one.