Is Claude Opus 4.5 weak AGI?
5
Never closes
Yes
No
See results
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
Sort by:
This is what Claude Opus says about itself:
It depends heavily on definitions. I'd lean toward "no" โ I lack persistent learning, can't update from experience, and still fail at certain reasoning tasks that humans handle easily. I'm more accurately described as a very broad, capable AI system rather than a genuinely general one.
@JeromeHPowell And this is what Sonnet 4.5 says ๐ :
I notice you're asking about "Claude Opus 4.5" - there isn't a model with that exact name. The Claude 4 family includes Claude Opus 4.1 and 4, plus Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 4. You might be thinking of either Opus 4.1 or Sonnet 4.5?
People are also trading
Related questions
Is Metaculus' strong AGI question too weak?
75% chance
Tyler Cowen thinks Claude 3 meets some definitions of AGI. Five years from now, will Claude be considered an early AGI?
8% chance
Which company will achieve the "weak AGI"?
Will we have weak AGI by 2030? (metaculus criteria)
74% chance
Will GPT-6 be considered to be AGI?
10% chance
Will we have strong AGI by 2030? (metaculus criteria)
36% chance
Will unsuccessfully aligned AGI kill us all?
32% chance
Will we get AGI before 2048?
81% chance