Would Self Resolving markets with dynamic caps on bets help make self resolving work better?
1
50Ṁ30
resolved Dec 3
Resolved
YES

Idea: self resolving markets would involve some function that calculates the max size of bet you're allowed to make, helping ensure that your trades are more effective at finding a ground truth schelling point.

For example: everyone would be allowed to bet at most 100 * traders in a market.

As # of traders increase, so is the max someone is allowed to directionally bet in the market.

The 100 per trader could be configured per market. This would help ensure whales can't artificially dominate the market, but at the same time ensure those serious about the market can participate to a greater degree than those who are not.

Another example: depending on the number of unique upvotes you get for a comment in that market (plus some fraction of comments in all markets) would increase the cap on any potential bet you make.

Or perhaps you are capped by the number of times you correctly win in markets.

Or, some combination of the above plus others. To be configured and weighted by the market creator.

Resolves to yes if % >= 50 on close, otherwise no.


PLEASE NOTE: I will resolve based on the current price at a random time in a 24h period before the end date to reduce manipulation. The random stopping idea is from this paper - https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04305

Please explain your reasons why you make a trade in this market.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ18
© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy