Grokipedia released before October 31?
131
1kṀ57k
resolved Oct 28
Resolved
YES

YES if, on or before October 31, 2025, 23:59 PT, an officially branded “Grokipedia” product is publicly released.

“Publicly released” means at least one of the following is true:

  • An official xAI or Elon Musk account (e.g., @xai, @elonmusk) announces that Grokipedia is live/available to the public, and it is accessible the same day; or

  • A publicly accessible site/app clearly labeled Grokipedia is available to the general public without a waitlist, invite, or employee-only access (temporary outages after launch don’t negate release); or

  • An official xAI page/blog (on an x.ai/grok.com domain) announces that Grokipedia is launched and publicly available.

NO if none of the above occurs by October 31, 2025, 23:59 PT.

Edge cases & notes

  • Invite-only/private alphas, closed betas, teasers, sign-up pages, job posts, or third-party rumors do not count.

  • A launch under a different name does not count unless official xAI channels explicitly state it is Grokipedia (e.g., “Grokipedia, formerly , is now live”).

  • If multiple claims conflict, prioritize official xAI/Musk channels and the public accessibility test above.

Primary resolution sources (in order of preference)

  1. Official posts from @xai or @elonmusk on X.

  2. x.ai / grok.com announcements or product pages.

  3. Major press reporting that cites an official xAI/Musk announcement.

Background: Musk/xAI have publicly teased a Wikipedia competitor called “Grokipedia,” with posts and coverage indicating an October timeframe.

  • Update 2025-10-21 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The official xAI website domain is x.ai (not xai.com). Resolution sources should reference x.ai or grok.com domains for official announcements.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ3,928
2Ṁ1,942
3Ṁ1,813
4Ṁ975
5Ṁ447
Sort by:

I knew I should've set a limit order, this messed me up like half a dozen times by now

@Brad missed out lil bro

This was great market guys! Time to resolve it to YES. Please let me know if anyone has objections.

https://archive.is/jaHL8

For some reason this article starts by talking about a U.S. official's dismissal in 2025, before the main body, which then only talks about an Australian political event from 1975.

@TiredCliche Its article on "negroid" begins with a broken piece of text markup before defending "race realism" for the last half

@TiredCliche "Walhalla" is straight up "Germanic spirit"

@TiredCliche I mean, what could we expect…

Their article on race intelligence says that sub-Saharan African countries have an average IQ of 70. That would mean about half of the population is mentally retarded and struggles to do things like talking and putting on their clothes.

It's also as if Grok was prompted to not write any sentence shorter than 30 words. This is the first sentence on the "Tesla Cybertruck" page:

"The Tesla Cybertruck is a battery-electric full-size pickup truck manufactured by Tesla, Inc., characterized by its polygonal, low-polygon aesthetic and an exterior structural exoskeleton composed of 3-millimeter-thick ultra-hard 30X cold-rolled stainless steel, which provides corrosion resistance comparable to 316L marine-grade steel and is claimed to be seven times stronger and more scratch-resistant than conventional automotive exterior steels."

@ItsMe I love it when an aesthetic is both polygonal and low-polygon.

[[WP:PEACOCK]]

@LyetKynes I'm not on X and only once tried Grok to see if it could play chess (it can't), so the sheer crappiness of this thing did surprise me a bit!

bought Ṁ38 NO

This seems like a bluff

bought Ṁ75 YES

I think they're reacting to insider information. So I'd be careful

@ItsMe and I think they're bluffing.

sold Ṁ2 NO

@TiredCliche Dangerous bluff.

@TiredCliche i've used it, it was up for a dozen minutes, it's down now

@Chumchulum it is protecting itself from online attacks, such as people wanting to look at it.

@TiredCliche my guess first reactions were ridicule for goofs. Wikipedia went through that. Grokipedia won't be exempt

@JussiVilleHeiskanen it doesn't even have wikilinks, how am I supposed to spend hours reading this mess

bought Ṁ50 YES

Hmm, no mention of the salute controversy on the Elon Musk page.

@ItsMe There is no page about South Africa's ICJ case against Israel, but there is a subheading on the page "Israel-Hamas war", entitled "International legal proceedings and biases".

It couldn't even pretend to be neutral for the subheading. This is godawful.

bought Ṁ1 NO

@Mana what is the clue that makes you 99%ish?

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy