
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/report-pm-rejected-us-proposal-for-saudi-normalization-in-exchange-for-path-to-palestinian-statehood/
https://www.nbcnews.com/investigations/effort-create-far-reaching-us-saudi-israeli-pact-end-war-rcna134396
Recently, there has been some discussion of opening a "path to Palestinian statehood" in the context of Israel-KSA normalization.
If Israel cedes any political control of any part of Area C - so if any of Area C gets transferred to Area B or Area A or other some kind of Palestinian or Arab political control - this resolves yes. Israeli annexation of parts of Area C would not be enough to resolve as yes. Israel giving up security control is not necessary for positive resolution. Renaming Area C but maintain full Israeli security and political control does not count.
People are also trading
@JamieCrom I wouldn't be so sure. Israel has full security control over Area B. In any case, Bibi is definitely out by 2027.
@BrunoParga Well I don't know, that's part of the point of this market. But I would it guess it means some of C -> B.
Uhh I think if some of Area C becomes something that's not Israel and not Area C, I would also resolve this "yes". I should edit to clarify that.
Thanks for the suggestion, edited the question to capture what I want it to capture.