By the end of 2028, will more than 50% of US trans youth live in states where best-practice medical care is banned?
14
1kṀ739
2029
52%
chance

Currently 28% of transgender youth live in states where best-practice medical care for transgender youth is banned, as reported by LGBT MAP: https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/healthcare_youth_medical_care_bans

If the above source stops reporting data at resolution time, data from Human Rights Campaign (https://www.hrc.org/resources/attacks-on-gender-affirming-care-by-state-map) will be used, or other similarly credible source.

  • Update 2025-02-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): States Defying Orders and In-Practice Access

    • If a state law or order banning best-practice care is not effectively enforced (i.e. patients continue to have in-practice access to care), this will count as not being a ban for resolution purposes.

    • For example, if a state directs healthcare providers to continue offering treatments despite a federal order, then that state would not be considered as banning care, potentially leading to a NO resolution.

  • Update 2025-02-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Update from creator

    • The resolution will use the care standard as it existed at the time the market was created.

    • Even if a reputable medical body later changes its guidelines or deems the care no longer best-practice for minors, that change will not affect the resolution criteria.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

This is a remarkably biased question. Nobody so openly displaying this kind of bias should be judging a market.

@RiverBellamy Hi River, it's unclear to me what bias you're picking up to here. The question of interest is whether the standard of care available to minors in the U.S. at the time the question was created would continue be widely available in the future.

I hold no position in the market, and have specified which rubrics and independent sources I will defer to if the basis of resolution is unclear.

@lumi I think you do know what I am referring to, because you carefully avoided it. You called puberty blockers and hormones "best-practice". Whether it is, in fact, the best practice, is precisely the point on which people starkly disagree. Nobody wants to hurt these kids. People just don't agree on which action is most likely to hurt these kids. Your wording of the question presumes that one answer is right and the other is wrong. Many people would say that the best practice medical care is probably some kind of counseling without puberty blockers, hormones, or surgery. Almost certainly no state will ban that.

A fair market would be worded something more like "by the end of 2028, will fewer than half of trans minors live in states where doctors can prescribe puberty blockers and hormones for gender dysphoria in minors?"

What are you defining as best practice? E.g. if APA publishes a revised guideline no longer recommending medical GAC for pre-pubescent children, then would state bans that do not conflict with this new guideline still count towards a yes?

@AlexBokov a source is provided and it provides a number and methodology to replicate it

Thanks for the question. For resolving this, I am going by the care standard as it existed when the question was created, even if a reputable medical body determines this type of care is no longer best-practice for minors.

Would a Federal ban on certain types of gender affirming surgery lead to a YES resolution?

@TobiasPace If states defy the orders, such that patients can in-practice still access the same care, it may resolve NO. For example, NYS is ordering NYU Langone to continue offering treatments contrary to the federal order.

@lumi Also, for the purpose of this question, in general, I am deferring to LGBT MAP's barometer unless they stop publishing.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy