
Established Titles was on all the youtube channels and then turned out to be a scam.
Resolves to YES if there is a mass Youtuber exodus apologizing for being affiliated but NO if this doesn't happen. This is mostly due to laziness.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ197 | |
2 | Ṁ33 | |
3 | Ṁ29 | |
4 | Ṁ28 | |
5 | Ṁ18 |
People are also trading
@julia no, I'm just skeptical of a finance product that advertises via influencers so much, and became more skeptical after watching this video
This is an interesting question, but I think it might help to have clearer resolution criteria. What would constitute a scam here? If they deceived clients about something (say, claimed to have a better balance sheet than they really did) but their business model is more or less what they said it was, would that be a scam? Or do they need to be lying about their business model to count as a scam? What if they just fail spectacularly despite high-flown promises?
@akrasiac I think if there's a similar exodus of youtubers dropping them as a sponsor, like what happened with Established Titles, then definitely the market will resolve to YES. I guess otherwise, I would look for reports of people trying to take their money out and not being able to?
I guess if they're a Ponzi scheme and they fund the owners of painting X that want out by signing up more new subscribers, I won't actually be able to tell using this method. Definitely open to more suggestions!