Whole shoe, doesn't require a valid NS solution
Update 2025-12-20 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): An edible shoe (e.g. made of chocolate or other food materials) does not count for resolution purposes.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ523 | |
| 2 | Ṁ196 | |
| 3 | Ṁ67 | |
| 4 | Ṁ49 | |
| 5 | Ṁ27 |
People are also trading
There's no rule saying Owen can't eat a shoe even without a NS proof. At this point we're just making a bounty market for Owen to eat a shoe. EDIT: People already made this joke below, my bad.
@jacksonpolack What's the line for "edible"? Would a shoe made of cheese count if he's lactose-intolerant?
@musteval My understanding is that "edible" is generally defined relative to the reference class of humans generally, rather than the individual. For example, if you are deathly allergic to strawberries, you would still regard strawberries as being an edible substance, just not one that you personally can safely eat due to your allergy.