![](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.googleapis.com%2Fmantic-markets.appspot.com%2Fcontract-images%2Fjacksonpolack%2Fqik894vjnn.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
In the event none responsible are identified resolves N/A
If multiple are responsible, if there's one primary resolves to that, otherwise resolves n/a
resolution delegated to joshua if ambiguous/disputed
Related questions
Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin said Monday that police had identified "profiles" of people who may have been behind the attack and suggested that far-left activists could have been responsible, though he did not provide specific evidence to back up his claim.
- Axios (after another act of sabotage) https://www.axios.com/2024/07/29/france-fiber-optic-olympic-attack
There has been an attack on German train infrastructure in Germany last year by left-wing radicals, to quote them:
A few liters of gasoline in the cable shafts on the rails should lead to as long-term as possible outages or restrictions in the transport of raw materials acquired, for example, in the course of neo-colonial exploitation and earth-destroying extractivism.
The basic math is just that if you have an option equivalent to "X or Y", then you can split it into two options, "X" and "Y". Every holder of an "X or Y" share gets that share replaced by one each of X and Y shares. The obvious price to start the new shares trading at is that they each trade at half the price of the original, and then you buy them up / down from there. Making the split requires adding liquidity in the same way that adding a new option that splits off "other" does.
Basically it's identical to splitting a new option off from "other"; there's nothing special about the "other" option, in general.