(long-term) Will existing LLMs have ~0 risk of catastrophic instrumental convergence if scaled up 1000x more compute? | Manifold

(long-term) Will existing LLMs have ~0 risk of catastrophic instrumental convergence if scaled up 1000x more compute?

4

70Ṁ33

2043

58%

chance

1H

6H

1D

1W

1M

ALL

from https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hc9nMipTXy2sm3tJb/vote-on-interesting-disagreements

Resolves whenever there's consensus in the AI field on this

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Will the best LLM in 2025 have <1 trillion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2025 have <500 billion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2026 have <1 trillion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2027 have <1 trillion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2026 have <500 billion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2027 have <500 billion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2027 have <250 billion parameters?

Will RL work for LLMs "spill over" to the rest of RL by 2026?

Will an LLM consistently create 5x5 word squares by 2026?

Will LLMs be better than typical white-collar workers on all computer tasks before 2026?

Related questions

Will the best LLM in 2025 have <1 trillion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2025 have <500 billion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2026 have <1 trillion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2027 have <1 trillion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2026 have <500 billion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2027 have <500 billion parameters?

Will the best LLM in 2027 have <250 billion parameters?

Will RL work for LLMs "spill over" to the rest of RL by 2026?

Will an LLM consistently create 5x5 word squares by 2026?

Will LLMs be better than typical white-collar workers on all computer tasks before 2026?

© Manifold Markets, Inc.•Terms•Privacy