Twitter permanently banned former president of the USA, Donald Trump, from the platform in January 2021 during the final days of his term. His handle @realDonaldTrump had over 88.9 million followers.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald J. Trump's verified Twitter account (@realDonaldTrump) tweets at least once in 2023 (ET timezone). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
The resolution source for this market will be Donald J. Trump's verified Twitter account: https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump.
Please note, only the @realDonaldTrump verified Twitter account counts for this market, regardless of the URL for this profile. If Donald J. Trump tweets from another account, it has no bearing on the resolution of this market.
//note: If any 2023 tweets appear on @realdonaldtrump timeline, it resolves yes.
This includes retweets, images, 'long tweets' ,Twitter Spaces announced, and other quasitweets published on the profile.
That was the market for 2022:
Related questions
๐ Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | แน37,015 | |
| 2 | แน34,092 | |
| 3 | แน8,797 | |
| 4 | แน4,671 | |
| 5 | แน2,270 |
@ZachEsenbock Youโre right, but the market description already accounts for this possibility:
โnote: If any 2023 tweets appear on @realdonaldtrump timeline, it resolves yes.
This includes retweets, images, 'long tweets' ,Twitter Spaces announced, and other quasitweets published on the profile.โ (Emphasis added)
How is a post not a quasitweet?
@JimHays โEmphasis addedโ, yet it is the only item in the list NOT emphasized. It is also spelled without a hyphen, I allege here, to create ambiguity in the definition. Given these two circumstances, I believe the made up term โquasitweetโ should be disregarded in the decision to resolve this market. See the screenshot below from Manifoldโs rules.
@ZachEsenbock Resolving this NO because of the technicality that it's a "post" and not a Tweet despite being posted on (the website formerly known as) Twitter would have been a violation of that rule.
Youโve had a long time to anticipate and raise this objection. That the market didnโt crash when tweets were renamed posts made it clear this was not how bettors interpreted the market.
@evergreenemily Both sides of the argument could make the same point with the same level of validity.
@Gen you've finally made it in the material world with vast hordes of mana, its time to begin the inner journey
Related questions
