HMYS can I get my manalink please? I need to resolve my meta-market

You said "I will manalink people 50 mana if they give me a good review for this market (5 stars)." I gave you a five star review. You made a promise, keep your promise.

You ask, "How do I know you're not gonna switch it afterwards?"

Well, simply, I don't care that much. But if you're so concerned about it...

@ForrestTaylor I don't think HMYS is going to pay you :(

@DanielFilan We'll see, they haven't been active for a few days

@TiredCliche That's not true

@chrisjbillington last activity I'm seeing from them was five days ago

@TiredCliche

@chrisjbillington That could just be a quick check-in without checking notifications. Hope springeth eternal in the human breast; Man never is, but always to be, blest.

@TiredCliche didn't they just make a market?

@DanielFilan

@DanielFilan yes but perhaps just a quick market.

@hmys is an agent of chaos, and said that their actions around this market were because it was fun to make people angry.

Making excuses for them is unnecessarily generous.

@chrisjbillington To you, perhaps; I am a Christian, and thus I believe God literally requires me to be unnecessarily generous

@TiredCliche well it's a good habit generally.

Wait why is HMYS hiding comments of people complaining about the misresolution?

This market was misresolved. If the market creator had in the description "decided by who gets the most votes" then it would be different, but you, you know, did not do that.

@ForrestTaylor actually I change my mind. DEFECT.

@hmys money pwease

@ForrestTaylor just make sure you switch it back to 1 star after you get the $M lol

@ForrestTaylor @hyms hey... money please

@hmys ... money please...

@hmys

Can people please give me good reviews? I will manalink people 50 mana if they give me a good review for this market (5 stars).

People are review bombing me with awful reviews because they are mad that I resolved this market correctly and they lost money.

@hmys You initially resolved a controversial market that you yourself had bet in, in the direction of your own bet, with no explanation, and no discussion period.

If you wanted a better review for me, I think it would’ve liked something a little bit more like what happened here:

https://manifold.markets/andrew/will-twitter-will-open-source-all-c#Nhzd3wPdk0tPOUcrulG6

Will Twitter will open source all code used to recommend tweets on March 31st?

Resolved CANCEL. [tweet]Very clear two week timeframe. So, do you believe him? Criteria for "open source": the code does not need to be runnable (it may be intertangled with their infrastructure), but does need to completely include how all recommendations are made. If a model is used, the model must be included (i.e., the code can't just use a remote blackbox model that automagically recommends tweets, and that counts as "open source all code"). If Twitter releases this before or on March 31, market resolves to YES. Otherwise, market resolves to NO.

@hmys I wouldn't say I'm "mad" (over just M40 fake money in my case) -- just think you mis-resolved this market given the very clear communication of the book review winners on ACX.

I'll note that I've given every market I've reviewed 5 stars up to this point, except for a misleading "Will Trump tweet" market that I lost 3,000M in since the market resolved on if Trump would tweet again after the mugshot tweet. In that case, I gave 3 stars since it was partially my fault for rushing in on the mugshot tweet news and not being more careful with markets that lack descriptions/clear criteria.

In the case of this market, even though it was for a reason many may not have foreseen, Scott did not win his contest because he disqualified himself. He didn't say he won and then change his mind; the disqualification was concurrent with the announcement of winners. If I had bet YES on this I would still be giving 1 star because I would still recognize the resolution to be incorrect.

Not sure the "I'll bribe you with mana for good reviews" approach is helping your position...

I did not participate in this market, and I think that either resolution could have been fine. I don't particularly care that OP had stake, it's not ideal, but I don't think a person should resolve contrary to what they think is the right outcome just because they had a stake.

But I did leave a 1-star review solely for bribery. This is halfway to bannable behavior IMO, if people can just offer mana for reviews, the reviews mean nothing.

@hmys manalink me my bribe please

@BoltonBailey How do I know you're not gonna switch it afterwards?

@hmys Did you respond to the wrong person?