OpenAi doesn’t usually drop parameter counts right?

@Issc would be hard to argue it's open source if we can't figure out the parameter count

@dmayhem93 Has openAi ever been open source?

@dmayhem93 I get it’s the resolution criteria it just seems very unlikely - OpenAi is super conservative with what they release

@Issc well the market is at 24% so make your free mana

@dmayhem93 Bets placed

@Issc They've released some non-LLMs like Whisper and CLIP. The last LLM was GPT-2. https://github.com/openai
I didn't think it was likely either but Mira buying ~1,500 makes me reconsider

@sucralose I think they might just be trying to spike the market idk

All good points actually - still sitting on a no because I think they aiming more towards the safe and closed environment especially with regulation kicking up

@dmayhem93 20B is close enough right?

@Mira not for this market 😔

@dmayhem93 Max is 15B?

@rockenots rounded yes, mostly to account for the awkward reporting of model weights that occasionally excludes embedding layers, or rounds it.

@dmayhem93 clearly I should have read the description, but having too many parameters seems like an odd complaint

@Tomoffer Not sure what you mean here, this is a bet on (OpenAI dropping new open source LLMs) AND (OpenAI is able to drop a model that matches and/or beats their previous GPT-3 that is at most 1/10th of it's size).

@dmayhem93 ok I was also missing some context then. My bad!

What does @Mira know that the rest of us don't?

@Dwaxe How to falsely spike markets as a prank

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/open-source-ai-is-gaining-on-google-and-chatgpt

https://twitter.com/synquid/status/1658168153355210752