mrgirl's position is that Destiny engages in sexual misconduct, not sexual abuse, so I will be resolving "NO"

"Unequal sexual relationships: In the last decade Destiny has formed dozens of sexual relationships"

"In 2020 Destiny himself explained why using your platform for sex with smaller creators is unethical"

Thats a statement right there claiming sexual abuse of dozens of streamers.

If the criteria is "verbatim says 'sexual abuse' in the article" then i guess its a NO.

@Firechyld in neither of those sentences does he claim abuse. You are just inferring it.

@Firechyld This is stretching realllllllly hard imo.

@johnleoks its really not a stretch. Its clear thats what Mr. Girl is implying. But, like I said, if the parameters are he has to state that exactly then the market should resolve NO.

@PhilWheatley thats exactly what the article was meant to convey. He never said it bc he knows its bullshit and there is no proof.

@Firechyld the thing is max has stated himself the article moved away from sexual abuse so that's not really true what you are saying

@PhilWheatley he has stated on all these interviews it was abuse.... its clear it was meant to be taken as abuse. The conversations are centering on abuse. Again, I think that the article is suppose to conclude that, without saying those precise words together.

Mr. Girl doesn't come close to concluding that Destiny is a "serial sexual abuser". Almost no "victim" in the article called him a sexual abuser, let alone Max himself concluding that Destiny is a SERIAL one. This can only resolve as NO. It's super clear cut.

@johnleoks Out here switching teams once the article is released. Shameless behaviour

@johnleoks scummy behavior.

Yea, this is a clear no.

The article references situations which Max argues have been presented as possible abuse, some sexual, but it was never widespread and prevalent enough to call “serial”.

In fact, very few of the accusations were sexual in nature at all, most were argued emotional manipulation and power dynamic abuses.

I can’t see a single way someone could see this article as Max claiming Destiny to be a “serial sex abuser” lol

@Awesometheory

I think this is supported by the fact this market has literally dropped to 10% lol - and will continue to fall

@Awesometheory The market fell because one major yes stakeholder sold a ton, don't think that constitutes a majority opinion.

Arguing for the yes position: while it doesn't appear Max conclusively states "yes steven is a serial sexual abuser," he does back up and support people in the article who claim he is committing serial sexual abuse.

This market should either resolve to yes or N/A

@Raze I agree he all but says it in these two quotes. "Dozens" of women would make it serial abuse.

"Unequal sexual relationships: In the last decade Destiny has formed dozens of sexual relationships"

"In 2020 Destiny himself explained why using your platform for sex with smaller creators is unethical"

Article is out: https://mrgirl.substack.com/p/the-destiny-report

I mean he's pretty petty.
https://twitter.com/mrgirlreturns/status/1635621731779100674

Attention all no buyers: you are very smart! You are loved! Sell to my orders!! Sell down to 11%!!

(It’s free money, I am never right)

@Gen Could you buy some more? I want free money please 🙏🙏🙏

How is this not higher? No way he doesn’t say it, regardless of the truth

70+ pages? He’ll say it for sure. Maybe in the intro even

@Gen The title might actually include, “destiny the sexual abuser”

Sell to me asap

For those interested in the object-level question: