This market resolves YES if there is a market correction which is alleged to be incorrect. Whether a correction is "improper" is subjective, so I will not trade in this market. I will attempt to grade the previous resolution on the merits and the facts: what happened vs. strictly interpreted resolution criteria.
Please post the drama in the comments :)
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ205 | |
| 2 | Ṁ114 | |
| 3 | Ṁ29 | |
| 4 | Ṁ4 | |
| 5 | Ṁ2 |
@chrisjbillington To make it clearer, in this comment David says why he re-resolved the market N/A:
But at minimum will be fining you for the unique trader bonuses earned from this and will unfortunately have to N/A this market as one of the colluders was the market creator.
And then in this later comment he says why that was a mistake and he's re-re-resolved back to the original resolution:
Okay, after further review I will be switching the resolution back to YES and want to apologise to @BTE for incorrectly assuming his involvement.