If I choose not to read the book, this resolves to my best guess estimate, by default the last market price. If I do attempt to read it, it resolves on Yes/No.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ41 | |
| 2 | Ṁ21 | |
| 3 | Ṁ18 | |
| 4 | Ṁ15 | |
| 5 | Ṁ14 |
People are also trading
Resolving to 25%, without resuming reading. I think that there is some chance this would prove worthwhile, and in a world where there was no avalanche of AI to work on I would finish, but I simply don't have the time when I don't see what I'd do even with the good version, and that time crunch makes it unlikely this would have worked out.
Wow that GPT poem is brutal.
Update: I did read the first 4 chapters (up through the one on Republicans). Extending the market close to April 30 to give me time to either read further or decide not to. I will say that it is not yet obvious to me which way I would resolve this market were I to finish.
@ZviMowshowitz Were the first four chapters a worthwhile use of your time? I am basing my no vote solely on his blog, which I found to be cringe
@ZviMowshowitz Nice! Good to know that you are reading it. I put a lot of mana on YES in the hopes of motivating you actually to read it, though I doubt it had much effect (and the market dropped even lower after that)
@ZviMowshowitz Just dropped last night! Highly recommend subscribing to Scott's substack for these gems.
@dreev I do my best to avoid subscribing to paywalls because in a sense things behind paywalls don't exist and I want to minimize how much I refer to them.
@ZviMowshowitz Ah, yeah, I hear that. Scott Alexander is the only writing I pay for on the internet. And I think Scott himself agrees with your point here. I can email you Scott's take on "What's Our Problem?" since you'll surely want to read Scott's review before the book.