Here's the relevant context, from the LA Times:
In one of the largest cash heists in Los Angeles history, thieves made off with as much as $30 million in an Easter Sunday burglary at a San Fernando Valley money storage facility, an L.A. police official revealed Wednesday...
The burglary occurred Sunday night at a facility in Sylmar where cash from businesses across the region is handled and stored....
The burglars were able to breach the building as well as the safe where the money was stored, Morales said....
Mystery surrounds the break-in... Further adding to the intrigue is that very few individuals would have known of the huge sums of cash that were being kept within that safe, according to the law enforcement sources.
An FBI spokeswoman confirmed Wednesday night that the agency and the LAPD are investigating the theft.
This market resolves YES if any alleged perpetrators of this heist are arrested by October 4th, 2024.
Details:
This will resolve based on reporting from credible, mainstream outlets (ideally, the LA Times) that an alleged perpetrator has been arrested. It does not require any further progress in the legal proceedings.
If it turns out the police screwed up and got the wrong person, that's beyond the scope of the question. What matters is reporting that someone was arrested due to their (alleged) involvement in this crime.
Further, reporting needs to allege that they actually took part in the robbery itself. I.e. it can't just be that they helped the robbers handle the money, or covered up for them later, or etc. The claim needs to be that they played a role on the night of the robbery itself.
I'm very far from an expert here, so please ask any/all clarifying questions and I'll continue to flesh out the market description as required.
Other sources:
