Market will resolve...

YES if a robot with the characteristics given below defeats the current olympic champion at their sport within the detailed time intervals.

NO if humans are still undefeated within the given time intervals.

OTHER if an unexpected situation happens.

The idea is for the robot to be physically similar to a human so the competition is fair. It must abide to the following limitations (which I'm open to changing, if given a good reason), as to make the competition fair.

-The robot must be approximately humanoid. Its design cannot grant it a notable advantage. Having hooks for hands is okay for 100m sprint, but not for boxing. If there's no consensus about its design being fair, then I'll decide.

-It's weight, height, proportions and other physical characteristics must have a precedent within the sport, or be otherwise reasonable. No 200kg boxing robots allowed. Longer-than-average arms for swimming are permited.

-It doesn't need to carry its own energy storage. It can be plugged into a cable.

-In the case of team sports, robots can't use "telepathy" (communicating to coordinate their actions as one).

-All real time processing must be done by a computer inside the robot. Having a supercomputer halfway around the world controlling it feels like cheating.

I may bet on this market.